A person who operates a website came across an article about cookie consent and the GDPR banners that a lot of sites have up. They found that it is somewhat of a speed run, and it is frustrating to the visitor. They shared this article in a large discussion group, and they wanted to know what other site managers from different countries thought about both the GDPR banners and the sites that have implemented them.
One person wrote back to say they also hate the banners. The next commentator said the banners give them a level of anxiety. One person thinks that the banners are not compliant because they have to be as easy to disable as they are to enable if they are going to be compliant. A person from Australia said that making domestic sites is easier because they do not have a GDPR type of policy for cookie tracking.
An individual had thoughts to share about how annoying both cookies and cookie warning banners are. In their opinion, site owners can never win with the GDPR policy. This person understood the intent of the policy, but they felt like it could have been implemented in a way that would not frustrate site owners as much.
Someone else had a piece of mind to share. In their line of thought, a site can implement cookies without the cookie banner. If the site does that, every function that uses a cookie would have to be disabled by default. The visitor would have to consent to enabling each one. It would apply to external things, such as Recaptcha and YouTube, too. Putting an option to show all the cookie options would be easier for all
This person also observed a lower page bounce rate when they implemented this on their own site. They added that everybody hates popups, even those that are mandated buy law. They try to hide invitations in the page where they matter. At the end of the day, the customer is still king, and the customers are tired from the popup ads they deal with daily. For more information click here https://cookieconsentspeed.run/.